The Laughing Armadillo presents her views on World politics from a UK perspective.

Warning: The following content may be offensive to sexists, racists, homophobes, Conservatives, Republicans and sociopaths.
Over the next few months I will be concentrating mostly on the US primaries and subsequent elections. That's a whole lot of crazy for you to enjoy.

I'm worried for humanity, disturbed and furious.
I have become the Raging Armadillo.
Showing posts with label Michigan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Michigan. Show all posts

Wednesday, 14 March 2012

USA Presidential Candidacy - Michigan, Arizona and The downfall of Rick Santorum

One British eye on the US Elections: Getting into power is more important than being faithful to your ideology... First we had New Labour, now the US presents New Republicans!

Romney wins across the board in the four elections leading up to Super Tuesday, dubbed that because 10 states will be going to the polls to cast their votes and it just happens to be on a Tuesday!

Romney bagged wins in Arizona with a sizeable lead, in Washington, where Ron Paul came second (he often does better when there's a caucus rather than a primary), in Wyoming and in the all important Michigan. Finishing with only 3% less than Romney, means that Santorum will actually pick up half of the delegates available in Michigan. Any one candidate needs to get 1,114 delegates to win the Republican Party nomination.

Prior to Super Tuesday, its fascinating to see the rise and fall of yet another conservative candidate. Prior to last week, Santorum was seen as a serious contender against Romney. The pressure was on for Romney to win in the state he was born in, Michigan, where his father had been governor during the 1960s. There was quite a few days of back and forth from the press biding for time, mostly because of the two week gap between Maine's elections and Arizona and Michigan's.
The death knell for Santorum's raging momentum came in stages. The first of which came with a poor performance during a pre-election debate in Arizona.
I had previously thought that Rick Santorum was almost untouchable in his crystal clear, tidy whitey Conservatism. Not the case at all. He desperately tried to defend his support for certain bills while he was Senator when Bush Jr. was in power, but to no avail. The biggest 'crime' being his support for No Child Left Behind. A controversial bill that fitted in nicely with Bush's 'Compassionate Conservatism'. It extended the budget of the federal Department for education and vowed to essentially 'leave no child behind' no matter what their ethnicity or social standing may be. Being condemned for supporting a bill that was helping people... Is he not enough of a selfish, racist, sexist, homophobic arsehole, he has to openly encourage illiteracy amongst the poor too?????

Well apparently yes, he does. So he did. Now calling for a decrease in national funding for education, Santorum has been claiming that colleges are nothing but farms churning out liberal left wing hippies – well if going to university or college makes me enlightened and free to make my own educated and reasoned moral choices please by all means burn me at the stake, I'm a danger to society.
He has also been hinting that home schooling your children is a much better alternative to state education – and to that I say, its nice to have the choice but its unfair to impose it or expect it of people. For a start home schooling is only a good idea if parents have the time not only to educate their children but to ensure that they still get to socialise. Also, its often the case that parents aren't always capable of home-schooling their children due to lack of eduction on their part. Its not for everyone. I know lots of cases where children have been home schooled for the right reasons, because of bullying, certain teachers attitudes or it might be the case that actually the school system can't provide the kind of attention some children need. However, when the right wing start pushing the idea you've got to question their motives.
Santorum has educated his 7 children in a controlled environment, and clearly taught them as he and his wife see fit – conditioning their children to believe in Creationism, reject global warming and see any sexual activity beyond reproduction as a sin, that's if they've actually taught them anything about sex at all... I predict a couple of Palin-esk teen pregnancies in their future. I'm sorry, I don't care how much some people live in fear of God, nothing much stops people from humping when the timing is right – its an impulse, and one that Santorum and his missus have acted upon at least SEVEN times – something tells me they didn't plan seven kids... I mean who plans on having seven kids, especially in the West... I mean, an even half dozen yeah, but seven? All I'm sayin'...

Santorum's views have proved to extreme. He's been too honest. He's laid all his conservatives cards on the table and people have shit themselves. Republican's are certain he can't beat Obama. Not only will the independents shy away from him, but even moderate Republicans will think twice about voting for a man who thinks contraception is a sin that should be made illegal. He paints this 'every man', middle class, hard working guy image of himself, but the people who identify with that side of him, hell, they can't afford to have a baby every time they wanna shake the bedroom furniture.
Romney may not always be in line with their beliefs but he has far more potential to beat Obama this November, and his party have realised they have to get behind him or things could go very wrong from here on out.  

Saturday, 18 February 2012

USA Presidential Primaries - Santorum gaining momentum in run up to Super Tuesday

Mitt's phaser set to stun... Rick Santorum you're in so much trouble...

Of course by phaser I mean Super PAC and by stun I mean pay out massive amounts of money to say mean things on national television.

So things didn't go so great for Romney a couple of Tuesdays back (7th Feb). Rick Santorum took the Minnesota caucus with a massive 44.8% of the vote leaving Romney far behind with a disappointing 16.9% and in Colorado nudged just ahead of Romney with 40% to Romney's 35% - and by doing so wins delegates for that state who will go on to vote at the national Republican convention in the summer. Santorum also won with a landslide 55.2% in Missouri, who regardless of not having any delegates up for grabs (they decide their delegates later on) still went ahead with a vote anyway, many assuming they just like the press attention.

Sure he cares about 100% of American's, unless your a woman, a homosexual, an Atheist, a Muslim, a single mother... etc... etc...

Despite Romney still being favourite for nomination, Santorum's wins could be put down to the fact that these states are traditionally made up of very conservative, very Christian Republicans. Romney, who is a Mormon as well as being thought of as a moderate, if only because what he says contradicts his actions as Governor of Massachusetts, and the inevitable hate campaign that has made Gingrich very unpopular with housewives the nation over, has made Santorum seem like the most viable candidate. For the people of Colorado, Missouri and Minnesota its a bit like picking thrush over claymidia, because at least you know can predict and diagnose thrush. Ron Paul didn't do too bad either, coming in second place in Minnesota.
However, Paul did lose a little momentum having narrowly lost out to Romney in Maine, an area where Paul has a big following, 39% to 36%. Though Paul, ever the optimist, exclaimed that it was so close it was almost a tie. It was essential for Romney to win Maine after the losses he's suffered earlier in the week.
Turn out was slightly up on last year but it hasn't stopped people from analysing the crap out of it. Despite there being little or no correlation between apathy towards electing a nominee and the outcome of the actual national election, people have continued to discuss what low turn out might mean, and what high turnout might mean, well that's politics for you. All in all, the only useful piece of information I can deduce is that a lower turn out seems to mean landslide wins for Romney. Most Republican's assume that he will win the nomination. Its estimated that around 80% of Republican's would rather have a nominee who is likely to beat Obama i.e. moderate and Pokemon fan Mitt 'gotta catch 'em all' Romney, therefore labelling him the frontrunner. In states where its inevitable that he will win, apathy is high among registered Republicans and turnout is low – thus Romney wins. If there's the slightest inkling that he might lose, as there was in South Carolina, turnout rises as people believe they have more influence over the vote – thus Romney most likely loses. I hope I haven't lost you there, I'm a bit confused myself... Anyhow, Gingrich and Santorum decided not to campaign in Maine but still came out with a small percentage of the vote.

Meanwhile, all the mudslinging and arguing about who's more conservative, who's more concerned about the poor, who's paying his taxes, who's fucking his secretary, who's going senile etc... Obama is up in the polls. Pitted against Romney, Obama is seen to care more about the middle classes. Obama was never going to be a revolutionary. The establishment, let alone his upbringing, would never let him, and he was never going to bring economic prosperity to everyone over night, but if anyone's could land the metaphorical plane in the storm it's him. After all, America simply has to look towards the UK to see that a jump to the right in government while in the middle of economic 'recovery' will only serve to steer the plane into the side of a mountain. There are many of us in Britain who can see the impending cliff side and I know a handful of swing voters who wish they'd listened to me when I warned them that after 13 years in opposition the Tories missed a fat pay-check and their fat cat friends who only appear when their in power - they're not really interested in protecting the public from economic decline.
Furthermore, economic recovery isn't just about policy, its about consistency, and spending the first couple of years in office undoing everything from progress in women's rights, gay rights and healthcare seems to be higher on the agenda for conservative Republican's like Gingrich and Santorum than actually getting the country out of recession, which is likely to waste more time money than their spending cuts will ever save.

The candidates move on to Arizona and Michigan, and we'll know what happens there on the 28th. Romney could lose this one with Santorum hot on his heels and gathering conservative momentum. 


Once Romney's biggest threat, now Gingrich appears to have been sidelined completely after being battered to death by Romney and the power of the Super PAC, bombarding people with Gingrich's adultery, ethical violations as Speaker in Congress and his undignified resignation. His unpopularity has reached new heights with many urging him to drop out and give his support to Santorum. Now, whether Santorum can win the loyalty of conservative voters in the long run and beat Romney to become candidate, or Romney's mighty wallet and that of his filthy rich friend's comes down and squashes Santorum like a bug is a story that is still playing out. 

The latest attack ads from both sides...

But one thing's for sure, the longer this battle continues the easier and more baby-like sleep will become for President Obama.

And I leave you with the controversial, yet honest, comedian Bill Maher in a clip from his show back in October. Hypocrisy is rife in the Republican party... right down to the very belief system they use as a front for their prejudices.. FYI 'The pizza guy' Maher is referring to here is nominee drop-out, one time Tea Party favourite and proven serial groper Herman Cain who once owned a Pizza Chain in the US which he returned to profitability after axing thousands of jobs...